Deeper Commentary
Nehemiah 3:1 Then Eliashib the high priest rose up with his brothers the priests, and they built the sheep gate-
Nehemiah's rebuilding of the walls is his defining work in his life. These are his memoirs, looking back. I suggest that in this very detailed record of it, he tacitly realizes that all was not so wonderful with his work. Sadly many conservatives have seized upon his account and used it to justify a right wing apparent zeal for God, zealously working for God by excluding apostate brethren and succeeding in doing God's work in a sea of internal apostasy and external opposition- that was possibly quite missing the point, and which was in fact contra the potential God had given him. For starters, the restoration prophecies spoke of Jerusalem being inhabited as a city without walls (Zech. 2:4, a prophecy probably contemporary with Nehemiah), open to the Gentiles to come and worship there. By building a wall around the temple area and seeking to exclude not only Gentiles, but Jews associated with Gentiles, Nehemiah perhaps missed the point. But, he did what he did for God and in prayer to God- just as many conservative Christians do. And we are to respect that and be encouraged by his spiritually minded approach to some things, even if it was a case of misplaced ideals. I will discuss later how the walls he rebuilt were an encirclement of the temple area, with a view to creating a hyper holy space that was Gentile-free. When the king of Persia had given him the resources necessary to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem- something, I will suggest, he didn't actually attempt to do.
Nehemiah's memoir concludes in Neh. 13:28 with Eliashib being rejected by Nehemiah because of his connections with Tobiah. So there was a fall out between them... and on Neh. 4:14 I will argue that the nobles and rulers, which surely included the High Priest, fell out with Nehemiah. "Eliashib" means God returns, a form of the word shub commonly used for the intended repentance and return of the exiles. It suggests this man was well motivated spiritually. Indeed he may have gone wrong later, allowing his son or grandson to marry Sanballat's daughter. Or, as discussed elsewhere (on Neh. 3:1,32; 4:1; 6:2), it could be that Nehemiah's falling out with this family was actually wrong, and his claims against them were wildly exaggerated. All we know about them is from Nehemiah's mouth. The description of the rebuilding of the walls starts and finishes with the sheep gate- the gate of the temple [not the whole city] where sacrifices were brought in to the temple area. This confirms the suggestion on :32 that Nehemiah's wall was in fact just around the temple and citadel of David, not the entire city. Many of the names of the builders appear to be Levites or priests. And they repaired outside their own houses- which were likely to be around the temple. Hence :31 "Malchijah, one of the goldsmiths, made repairs as far as the house of the temple servants". Hence "the temple servants living on Ophel made repairs up to a point opposite the Water Gate on the east... Above the horse gate, the priests made repairs, each one across from his own house" (:26,28). Some of the words for "house" really mean 'chambers'. Again, the hint is that this rebuilt wall was around the temple area. The exact geographical locations of the places mentioned is very hard to ascertain, because Jerusalem has been rebuilt so many times. The Dung Gate may refer to a temple gate, where the unclean remains of the sacrificial animals were immediately taken to and cast "outside the camp".
We must be aware that there were gates to Jerusalem, and also "the gates of the house of Yahweh" (1 Chron. 9:23; 22:3; 2 Chron. 23:19; 31:2). I suggest it may be "the gates of the house of Yahweh" that are in view in the descriptions of Nehemiah's gates and walls. This is why it is the Levites who were appointed as the gatekeepers, the watchers of the gates (stressed three times in Neh. 11:19; 12:25; 13:22). That makes more sense if the gates were gates to the temple area. The gates referring to the entrance to the temple area rather than the city of Jerusalem makes sense in passages like Ps. 100:4 "Enter into His gates with thanksgiving, into His courts with praise"; and the many references to the gates of Zion, which refers to the temple area (Ps. 87:2 etc.). Hence we read of "the gates of this house", the temple (Jer. 22:4). These temple gates are repeatedly mentioned in the plans for the new temple (Ez. 40:18,27 etc.), "They are to be ministers in My sanctuary, having oversight at the gates of the house, and ministering in the house" (Ez. 44:11). These gates contrast with "the gates of the city" (Ez. 48:31).
Eliashib rose up and built in response to Nehemiah's call to rise up and build. Eliashib was the local religious leader, and his response to the call of a total newcomer is surely commendable. We may hear the call from those we find difficult to hear it from... but still we are to respond. "Rose up / arose" is a word used often of the 'rising up' of the exiles to rebuild Jerusalem (Ezra 1:5; 3:2; 9:5; Neh. 2:18; 3:1). This was a fulfilment of the command to "Arise... Jerusalem!" (Is. 51:17; 52:2; 61:4). But this 'arising' was to be associated with the dawning of Zion's light in the form of Yahweh's glory literally dwelling over Zion (Is. 60:1). This didn't happen at the time, because the appearance of 'arising' by the exiles was only external and wasn't matched by a spiritual revival.
They sanctified it, and set up its doors; even to the tower of
Hammeah they sanctified it, to the tower of Hananel- "Hammeah" is LXX "tower of the hundred".
It could be they repaired 100 cubits around the tower of Hananel.
Nehemiah 3:2 Next to him built the men of Jericho. Next to them built
Zaccur the son of Imri- The close fellowship between priests and secular people is stressed in
the LXX "And they builded by the side of the men of Jericho, and by the
side of the sons of Zacchur, the son of Amari".
Nehemiah 3:3 The sons of Hassenaah built the fish gate; they laid its beams,
and set up its doors, its bolts, and its bars-
Zech. 2:4 had foretold that “Jerusalem shall be inhabited as towns without
walls for the multitude of men and cattle therein”, seeing that Yahweh
Himself would be as a wall of fire around her to protect her from her
adversaries (Ezra had recognized this promise, that God would be a wall to
them- Ezra 9:9). Note how this prophecy is introduced by an Angel with a
measuring reed measuring out the rebuilt Zion (Zech. 2:1), just as we have
in Ezekiel 40. But Judah disbelieved the promise of a Divine wall of fire,
and insisted on building a physical wall to protect them; and the record
in Nehemiah has plenty of reference to their setting up of bars and gates
in their fear (Neh. 3:3,6,13-15). By doing so they disallowed the
fulfilment of Ez. 38:11, and thereby precluded what was prophesied as
subsequently following. If they had trusted Him and paid their tithes,
their cattle would have multiplied, and the Scythian tribes would have
come down to seek to take them, as Ezekiel 38:12,13 foretold. But as it
happened, their cattle were diseased and their agriculture not blessed
because of their dilatory attention to Yahweh’s house that lay waste
(Haggai 1:11). So therefore there was no invasion, and no victory against
the nations, and no Kingdom established at that time.
Nehemiah 3:4 Next to them, Meremoth the son of Uriah, the son of Hakkoz
made repairs. Next to them, Meshullam the son of Berechiah, the son of
Meshezabel made repairs. Next to them, Zadok the son of Baana made
repairs-
Although I will suggest that Nehemiah was working on the basis of
misplaced ideals, God will still confirm His servants in the service they
wish to offer. No matter how muddled their motives and misplaced their
understanding. I've done and seen so much of this in my ministry.
"Repaired" is the word used for 'strengthened'. They
strengthened their hands and their hands were strengthened (s.w. Neh.
2:18 "Let us arise up and build. So they strengthened their hands for the
good work"; Zech. 8:9,13 "Let your hands be strong, you who hear in these
days these words from the mouth of the prophets who were in the day that
the foundation of the house of Yahweh of Armies was laid... Don’t be
afraid. Let your hands be strong"), and this empowered them to strengthen ("repair") the
walls. This in turn could have fulfilled the restoration prophecy of Is.
54:2 "strengthen your stakes", the tent pegs of the revived tabernacle.
But sadly this was but tokenistic fulfilment and their abiding
disobedience and impenitence precluded the fulfilment of the full
prophetic potential at the time. It is all therefore reapplied and
reinterpreted with regard to the work of the Lord Jesus.
Meshullam's daughter was married to Jonathan, the son of Tobiah, one of Nehemiah's critics (Neh. 6:18) who was against the rebuilding project. This raises many possibilities. Was Meshullam doing what his own in-laws were against? Or did he participate as a form of infiltration? Or was Nehemiah's fallout with the Tobiah /Sanballat family just plain wrong, and he ended up excluding and vilifying some of the hardest workers?
Nehemiah 3:5 Next to them, the Tekoites made repairs; but their nobles
didn’t put their necks to the work of their Lord- The
greater or
lesser devotion to the Lord's work has been preserved in the record all
these generations. LXX "And next to them the Thecoim took their place; but
the Adorim applied not their neck to their service". We could also
read this as meaning that they absolutely refused to do the work. Or, that
they did it without enthusiasm. We note how the nobles abused the
people and later turned against Nehemiah (Neh. 6:10-13,16,17), at least as
he presents it; as possibly did others in this list in Neh. 3.
Nehemiah 3:6 Joiada the son of Paseah and Meshullam the son of Besodeiah
repaired the old gate. They laid its beams, and set up its doors, and its
bolts, and its bars- Every detail of their work was recorded and has
been for millennia, so sensitive was God to every bit of carpentry done
for Him and the work of His Kingdom. And He remains so to this day.
Nehemiah 3:7 Next to them, Melatiah the Gibeonite, and Jadon the
Meronothite, the men of Gibeon and of Mizpah, repaired the residence-
See on Neh. 2:8.
RV "throne". It seems that the governor of the Persian empire to the west
of the Euphrates (who was based in Damascus) had a throne on the northern
wall of the city, which is where he would typically arrive from Damascus
when he visited Jerusalem. This point is seen as the limit of the northern
city wall.
Of the governor beyond the River- The fact they were still under the power of the Persian empire is emphasized, in tacit recognition of the fact that they had not received the radical independence and freedom promised in the restoration prophets. Zech. 9:8-10 is a prophecy of Nehemiah, Zerubbabel or Joshua which had to have its real fulfilment deferred until the coming of Jesus: “Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass [Did Zerubbabel / Joshua like Nehemiah enter Jerusalem on a donkey?]. And I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem [the opposing Samaritans], and the battle bow shall be cut off: and he shall speak peace unto the heathen: and his dominion shall be from sea even to sea, and from the river even to the ends of the earth”. This latter phrase contrasts with the repeated reminder that the Persians had dominion “on this side the river” (Ezra 4:10,11,16; 5:3,6; 6:13; 8:36; Neh. 3:7). The coming King (and Joshua was prophesied as a king) was to free Judah from Persia’s dominion, and establish God’s Kingdom, with boys and girls playing in the streets of Jerusalem (Zech. 8:5).
Rashi: "A throne for the governor of the land beyond the river". This was part of the deal Nehemiah had offered the king- to build a Persian fortress for the garrison, right next to the temple, and to enforce and strengthen Persian power. What should Nehemiah have been thinking? That Zion must be free of all Gentile power. Instead, he reinforced it, the deal being that the shame of Jerusalem being a city without walls was thus taken away. Because he also got permission to rebuild the walls. Rashi further interprets Neh. 3:7: "The [people of] the land beyond the river built a throne for the governor of the land beyond the river to sit upon". Nehemiah could even have been the Messianic ruler who came to Zion as prophesied by Zechariah and Malachi. He looks back in these his memoirs and reflects that 'I was not Jesus as I should have been'. Just as we do.
Nehemiah 3:8 Next to him, Uzziel the son of Harhaiah, goldsmiths, made
repairs. Next to him, Hananiah one of the perfumers made repairs, and they
fortified Jerusalem even to the broad wall-
We note that those
unaccustomed to heavy manual work still did it. This is the unity of the
Spirit experienced when the body of believers put their hearts to the work
of the Kingdom.
Isaiah’s messianic prophecies describe a Saviour coming from both the
north and the east (especially in Is. 41). Babylon was to the East of
Judah, and yet the approach road came down from the north. This Saviour
could have come and brought destruction of the Gentile opposition, and
established the Kingdom of God in the land. The carpenter encouraged the
goldsmith (Is. 41:7) in the building of the wall (cp. Neh. 3:8,32), and
there are other links with what happened at the restoration (e.g. the way
each worker says to his neighbour “be of good courage”, the same word used
throughout Nehemiah for the ‘repairing’ or strengthening of the wall). But
evidently the intended, possible fulfilment just didn’t happen. The
fulfilment has been deferred until the return of Jesus. He will come from
Heaven, the figurative “north”, rather than literal Babylon; the essence
will be gloriously fulfilled, but not every literality. And so it may well
be with the prophecies of the temple and worship system which was to be
restored.
Nehemiah 3:9 Next to them, Rephaiah the son of Hur, the ruler of half the
district of Jerusalem, made repairs-
It seems that the actual
builders are recorded here; and the idea was that the ruler worked next to
goldsmiths who likewise were unaccustomed to manual labour (:8). Although
Jerusalem was in ruins, there were still civil divisions and rulers over
them.
Nehemiah 3:10 Next to them, Jedaiah the son of Harumaph made repairs
across from his house. Next to him, Hattush the son of Hashabneiah made
repairs- It is always tempting to do God's work insofar as it
reinforces our own personality or has some perceived benefit for us or our
family. And so it seems it was with Jedaiah; he repaired the wall opposite
his own house. "Harumaph" means 'slit nose', “to be
disfigured, mutilated, any split portion of the face”. We can conjecture
that it was a disfigured person who quietly got on with repairing his
section of the wall.
Nehemiah 3:11 Malchijah the son of Harim, and Hasshub the son of Pahathmoab,
repaired another portion, and the tower of the furnaces-
Malchijah was one of the Jews accused of marrying the people of the land (Ezra 10:31), whom I there suggested may well have been simply the disenfranchised Jews who had remained in the land after the exile. We are invited therefore to wonder whether Ezra's judgment of them had been too harsh. The classical position of course would be that this man repented of his marriage out of the faith and then became zealous for Nehemiah's project.
"Another portion" could suggest that they repaired not only their allotted section but another one as well. And this is noted; and such a person worked next to the one who was apparently more interested just in working for the benefit of their own house (:10). This is the same juxtaposition of motives and personalities which we find amongst God's people today.
Nehemiah did his very best to bring the potential Kingdom of God about by
urging the people to repentance and conformity to God’s will, such was his
perception of what was going on; that the coming of God’s Kingdom was
being limited by the apathy of his own people. "Portion" is the word
elsewhere translated "measure". No fewer than 24 times in
Ez. 40-48 are we told that the temple was to be built by ‘measure’ (e.g.
Ez. 40:3,5,10,21,22,24,28,29); and the same word occurs frequently in
describing how Nehemiah gave various groups of Jews their own ‘measure’ or
"portion" in the work of rebuilding Jerusalem (Neh. 3:11,19,20,22,24,27).
See on :31. As he ‘measured out’ the work of rebuilding Jerusalem,
he must have been conscious of the Kingdom prophecy of Jer. 31:38-40:
“Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that the city shall be built to
the LORD from the tower of Hananeel unto the gate of the corner. And the
measuring line shall yet go forth over against it upon the hill Gareb, and
shall compass about to Goath. And the whole valley of the dead bodies, and
of the ashes, and all the fields unto the brook of Kidron, unto the corner
of the horse gate toward the east, shall be holy unto the LORD; it shall
not be plucked up, nor thrown down any more for ever”. It
could
have been fulfilled, this could have been the potential Kingdom of God,
and he set about to seek to fulfill it; but those places were not kept
“holy unto the Lord”, and therefore the Jews were to be again plucked up
and thrown down. The wall Nehemiah
built was not according to the definitions of Jer. 31. Perhaps he is
looking back in his memoir and recognizing that he had not lived up to his
potential. Just as we all do.
Nehemiah 3:12 Next to him, Shallum the son of Hallohesh, the ruler of half
the district of Jerusalem, he and his daughters, made repairs-
This
continues the theme of the work being done by those unaccustomed to manual
work; the use of women connects with how goldsmiths, perfumers (:8) and
civil administrative rulers all worked together in the great work.
Nehemiah 3:13 Hanun and the inhabitants of Zanoah repaired the valley
gate. They built it, and set up its doors, its bolts, and its bars, and
one thousand cubits of the wall to the dung gate- This was a huge
amount of work to be done by one group- 1000 cubits of wall.
Ez. 48:31-34 envisaged the 12 gates of Jerusalem being named after the
12 tribes of Israel. But it seems no accident that twelve separate gates
of the city are mentioned in the restoration record- but they weren't
renamed after the tribes of Israel. Here are the names of the city gates
in Nehemiah: valley (Neh. 3:13); horse (Neh. 3:28); east (Neh. 3:29);
Miphkad (Neh. 3:31); water (Neh. 8:16); dung (Neh. 12:31); fountain (Neh.
12:37); Ephraim, old, fish, sheep and prison gates (Neh. 12:39). No wonder
some wept when the rebuilt temple was finally dedicated- the pattern of
Ezekiel's vision hadn't been followed, even on such basic matters as the
names of the twelve gates of Jerusalem.
Nehemiah 3:14 Malchijah the son of Rechab, the ruler of the district of
Beth Haccherem, repaired the dung gate. He built it, and set up its doors,
its bolts, and its bars- The dung gate was at the south west corner
of the wall. If Malchijah was indeed a Rechabite, then they were forbidden
to live in houses (Jer. 35:7). If indeed Jerusalem was in the totally
ruined state as Nehemiah presents it, then it was somehow appropriate that
a Rechabite ruled over part of those ruins.
Nehemiah 3:15 Shallun the son of Colhozeh, the ruler of the district of
Mizpah, repaired the spring gate. He built it and covered it, and set up
its doors, its bolts, and its bars, and the wall of the pool of Shelah by
the king’s garden, even to the stairs that go down from the city of David-
The record now moves on to those who repaired the southern part of the
wall.
The emphasis in the record on bars, gates and locks (e.g. Neh. 3:15)
was perhaps to highlight how the restoration prophecies of Ezekiel, of a
people living confidently
without those things, had
actually not been fulfilled; and therefore the prophesied events of Ez.
38-40 didn't happen- i.e. an invasion of a restored Judah, dwelling
without bars and gates, which would lead in to the rebuilding of the
temple and establishment of the Kingdom. Note how the restoration Psalm
Ps. 76:1-5 speaks in the prophetic perfect of a great battle at Jerusalem
which Yahweh would win. Perhaps this speaks of the same battle spoken of
in Ez. 38, which could have come true in God's prophetic program, had the
people rebuilt the city as they should have done.
Nehemiah 3:16 After him, Nehemiah the son of Azbuk, the ruler of half the
district of Beth Zur, made repairs to the place opposite the tombs of
David, and to the pool that was made- This work was commendable in
that this Nehemiah was from Beth Zur (Josh. 15:58) which was some way out
of Jerusalem. So he got no personal benefit from the work, unlike Jedaiah
in :10, who repaired the wall directly opposite his own house. And so it
seems that some will get apparently more personal benefit from their
service of God than others. "The pool" was perhaps that made by Hezekiah
(2 Kings 20:20; Is. 22:9-11).
And to the house of the mighty men- Perhaps the barracks for David's mighty men (2 Sam. 16:6; 23:8).
Nehemiah 3:17 After him the Levites, Rehum the son of Bani, made repairs.
Next to him, Hashabiah, the ruler of half the district of Keilah, made
repairs for his district- Again we see the juxtaposition of
personality types within the body of God's people. The Levites, the manual
workers associated with the temple service, are working together with a
ruler. Keilah was some way out of Jerusalem, so he got no personal benefit
from doing this work; see on :16.
Nehemiah 3:18 After him, their brothers, Bavvai the son of Henadad, the
ruler of half the district of Keilah, made repairs- Keilah was some
way out of Jerusalem, so they got no personal benefit from doing this
work; see on :16.
Nehemiah 3:19 Next to him, Ezer the son of Jeshua, the ruler of Mizpah,
repaired another portion, across from the ascent to the armoury at the
turning of the wall- The people of Mizpah had already been mentioned
as repairing another section in :7. The simple truth is that some respond
to the call to work more zealously and extensively than others; partly
because they are simply wired differently, some being more proactive than
others; and partly because of differing levels of faith.
There are levels of response to
God. We all get salvation by grace, the penny a day of the parable. But
then works will also be rewarded. One trades his talents for more than
another. One star shines brighter than another. That being the case,
surely we should not be minimalists, but seek to serve God to the maximum.
Nehemiah 3:20 After him, Baruch the son of Zabbai
earnestly repaired
another portion, from the turning of the wall to the door of the house of
Eliashib the high priest- We again note how the extent of zeal was
recorded and noted by God; in this case, it is noted that he "earnestly
repaired". But the verb means ‘to
be angry’, and is used only elsewhere in Job 19:11: "He has also kindled
His wrath". People sometimes serve God as an outlet for their anger. This
might be a case of it.
"Another portion" seems to mean 'the next section'. I discuss on :32 how it seems the wall was only around the temple area and the ancient, nearby 'city of David'. The sections weren't very long, some are vaguely defined, one extending only the length of Eliashib's house, and other sections only immediately in front of a person's house: "Meremoth... built the next section, up to the far end of Eliashib's house. The following priests rebuilt the next several sections of the wall: Priests from the area around Jerusalem built the next section; Benjamin and Hasshub built the next section, which was in front of their houses; Azariah... built the next section, which was in front of his house" (:21-23 GNB). If the sections were so small, there's no way the wall encircled the whole city. It seems :13 mentions the repairing of "one thousand cubits of the wall" as if this were unusually large- about 450 meters. Other brigades only repaired what was immediately outside their own houses.
We note that the 41 brigades of workers were unevenly distributed: "the north with eight work outfits (Neh. 3:1-5); the west with ten work outfits (Neh. 3:6-13); the south with two (Neh.3:14-15); the east with twenty-one (Neh. 3:16-32)". Why such little attention to the south? Because south of the temple was the City of David [Ophel], connected to the temple by the Southern Steps. These are mentioned in :15: "even to the stairs that go down from the city of David".
Nehemiah 3:21 After him, Meremoth the son of Uriah the son of Hakkoz
repaired another portion, from the door of the house of Eliashib even to
the end of the house of Eliashib-Meremoth had done his own allotted
portion (:4) and now took on "another portion". There can be no spirit of
minimalism amongst those who are truly strengthened to do God's work and
who perceive God's hands working with their hands, as was the case with
the restoration of the Kingdom at this time.
Nehemiah 3:22 After him, the priests, the men of the Plain, made repairs-
These priests presumably had property in the Jordan valley (s.w. Gen.
13:10; 19:17; 2 Sam. 18:23), "the plain"; there were men of Jericho, from
the same area, involved in the work (:2).
Nehemiah 3:23 After them, Benjamin and Hasshub made repairs across from
their house. After them, Azariah the son of Maaseiah the son of Ananiah
made repairs beside his own house- It is always tempting to do God's
work insofar as it reinforces our own personality or has some perceived
benefit for us or our family. And so it seems it was with these men; they
repaired the wall opposite their own houses. This contrasts with those
from outlying towns who came in to work in Jerusalem. And so it seems that
some will get apparently more personal benefit from their service of God
than others. God alone can judge our motives.
Nehemiah 3:24 After him, Binnui the son of Henadad repaired another
portion, from the house of Azariah to the turning of the wall, and to the
corner- LXX links this with :25, "to the turning of Phalach [Palal]".
"Another portion" as in :21 suggests he had finished his own portion and
had taken on another.
Nehemiah 3:25 Palal the son of Uzai made repairs opposite the turning of
the wall, and the tower that stands out from the upper house of the king,
which is by the court of the guard. After him Pedaiah the son of Parosh
made repairs- The court of the guard was inside the king's house
(Jer. 32:2), and was used as a prison, therefore it was near the prison
gate (Neh. 12:39). The way these ancient descriptions are internally
corroborated is one of those 'ring of truth' impressions we get from the
inspired record.
Nehemiah 3:26 (Now the Nethinim lived in Ophel, to the place over against
the water gate toward the east, and the tower that stands out.)- The
implication may be that the Nethinim, the manual worker servants of the
temple and priesthood, were the ones intended to do this kind of manual
building work; but apparently they didn't.
Nehemiah 3:27 After him the Tekoites repaired another portion, over
against the great tower that stands out, and to the wall of Ophel-
Tekoah was outside of Jerusalem; so we have another example here of people
coming in to work for the sake of the overall wider good of God's people,
as opposed to those who repaired parts of the wall near to their own
homes. And they repaired "another" or a "second" portion, in addition to
what they had originally repaired.
Nehemiah 3:28 Above the horse gate, the priests made repairs, each one
across from his own house- As observed throughout this chapter, some
got immediate personal advantage from their work and others didn't. The
ideal of course is that the motivation should be the same for us all.
Nehemiah 3:29 After them, Zadok the son of Immer made repairs across from
his own house. After him, Shemaiah the son of Shecaniah, the keeper of the
east gate, made repairs- As noted on :28, some got immediate personal
advantage from their work and others didn't, coming in from outside of
Jerusalem to work on the project. The ideal of course is that the
motivation should be the same for us all. Shemaiah is the one of 1 Chron.
3:22. He must have been an old man, as his son Hattush had returned to
Jerusalem with Ezra (Ezra 8:2,3); again we get the impression of those not
naturally adequate to the work still doing it (goldsmiths, perfumers,
daughters, administrators and now old men). Whilst we are given talents
which we should use in God's service, it is also true that His service is
a going against the grain of our natural desires and not a mere
reinforcement of our natural aptitudes and personalities; ultimately, we
are called to carry the cross of the Lord Jesus.
The east gate refers not to the east gate of Jerusalem, but the east gate of the temple, the eastern approach to the temple precincts. Again, the wall was built around the temple area, not the whole city.
Nehemiah 3:30 After him, Hananiah the son of Shelemiah, and Hanun the
sixth son of Zalaph, repaired another portion. After him, Meshullam the
son of Berechiah made repairs across from his place- "Place"
is the word for 'chamber' (s.w. Neh. 12:44; 13:7), alluding to the
chambers around the temple precincts for the priests to stay in and store
their things in.
LXX "his treasury". See on :28,29. "After him" is in some versions "after me", as if Nehemiah himself worked on the wall. As the overseer of the work (Neh. 4:13-23), it was appropriate that he led by example.
Nehemiah 3:31 After him, Malchijah one of the goldsmiths to the house of
the Nethinim, and of the merchants, made repairs over against the Muster
gate, and to the ascent of the corner- See on :11.
Nehemiah
arranged for 12 gates to be built in the wall, as Ez. 48:31-34 had
commanded there to be. He built ‘miphkad’, “the Muster Gate” (Neh. 3:31
RSV), the “appointed place” [s.w.] of Ez. 43:21. But he didn't name the
gates as he could have done and didn't appear willing to follow the
restoration prophecies as a template for rebuilding the city. He like Ezra
was more focused upon restoring the traditional former national glory and
the old covenant, rather than accepting the new covenant. ‘Miphkad’
occurs in Ez. 43:21, where they were to burn "the sin offering... in the
appointed place (miphkad)
of the house, without the sanctuary". Presumably it was the gate through
which the bullock of the sin offering was led "without the sanctuary".
Again we see that we are dealing with the temple area walls, not those of
the whole city.
Nehemiah 3:32 Between the ascent of the corner and the sheep gate-
This
marks a full circuit back to the sheep gate with which this account began
(:1). Commentators on Neh. 3 are
divided between those who argue that the various locations mentioned show
the entire city of Jerusalem being walled, and those who argue that the
locations show a very small and limited wall around the temple and
southeastern hill. On the side of the latter is that fact that it has
frequently been observed by archaeologists that there is no evidence in
the excavations for a wall built around all Jerusalem at the Persian
period- only around the smaller area. My review of the various arguments
suggests a building or
rebuilding of only the walls around the southeastern hill ["the city of
David"] and the Temple Mount. Hence the work was done in 52 days; it would
stretch credibility to think that the entire walls of the whole city could
have been rebuilt so quickly. The wall was clearly to protect the temple,
not the whole city. The archaeological evidence is clear about this. Which
leads to the suspicion that Nehemiah's concern was to protect the temple
area from defilement, to as it were create a hyper holy physical space.
This is exactly what the Persians and Egyptians did- they built walls
around their temples and holy places, so that they would not be defiled.
And Nehemiah now in his memoir is looking back to how he was pained at how
the walls and gates of Jerusalem were burnt with fire, how he had got
permission to rebuild them (Neh. 2:13)- but in fact he chickened out of
the challenge, and despite being acclaimed as the great wall builder, he
actually achieved far less- he built the walls of a much smaller area than
Jerusalem, just the area around the temple and "city of David" next to it.
References later in Nehemiah to the "walls of Jerusalem" are as relevant
as the walls of a city today being still referred to as the city walls,
although the city extends far beyond them. His self-examination is
commendable. He looks back, as we probably have to, and realizes he had
God's blessing, all resources guaranteed... to rebuild the entire walls of
Jerusalem. But he did something, not nothing- but very far from the
potential that was possible. That may be a reason why he gives us so much
detail about the work he did. It is a confession of relative failure, not
a boast. Tragically it has been misread as a fantastic achievement to
'rebuild the walls of Jerusalem', just as our efforts may receive the
approbation of men, but were far short of our Divinely intended and
possible potential. And yet we think of those rulers, old men,
young women, men not used to manual work, all having their hands
strengthened to arise and build. It's a scenario similar to William
Golding's novel The Spire, where a spire is be built on a
cathedral for very wrong motives, but the workers do it for the glory of
God, and one quietly inscribes "to His glory" at the top of the spire,
unseen by any human eye.
The goldsmiths and the merchants made repairs- Again we get the impression of those not naturally adequate to the work still doing it (goldsmiths, perfumers, daughters, administrators and now old men). Whilst we are given talents which we should use in God's service, it is also true that His service is a going against the grain of our natural desires and not a mere reinforcement of our natural aptitudes and personalities; ultimately, we are called to carry the cross of the Lord Jesus.