Deeper Commentary
Isaiah 54:1 Sing, barren, you who didn’t bear; break forth into
singing, and cry aloud, you who did not travail with child-
The allusion is to Sarah, to whom the exiles had earlier been bidden to
"look" for inspiration (Is. 51:2). Sarah in her time of child-birth is likened
to us all as we enter the Kingdom, full of joy (Is. 54:1-4); and yet at
that time she was eaten up with pride and joy that she could now triumph
over her rival; see on Gen. 21:10. And yet Sarah at that time is seen from
a righteous perspective, counted as righteous, in that she is a type of us
as we enter the Kingdom. God's mercy to Sarah and Abraham is
repeated to us daily.
It could also be that what is in view here are spiritual children.
The Divine hope was that the lack of spiritual 'children' amongst the
exiles, repentant converts to the prophetic message, was going to be
replaced by such "children" from among the Gentiles.
For more are the children of the desolate than the children of
the married wife, says Yahweh-
The two women represent Zion past and present. When she had been
married to Yahweh she was barren; but the paradox is that now she was
"desolate" she was going to have children, and she would do so without
going through "travail" for them (Gal. 4:27).
Gal.
4:27 confirms this interpretation and develops it, connecting unbelieving
Israel with the barren woman and the largely Gentile church with the
fruitful one.
The
idea of God being destroyed in the destruction of His people (see on Jer.
6:26) may be the basis of the descriptions of Zion as being left widowed
(Lam. 1:1; Is. 54:1-8). We ask the question- if she was a widow, who died?
Her husband, God, was as it were dead. The very idea of the death of God is
awful and obnoxious. But this was and is the depth of God’s feelings at His
peoples’ destruction.
Isaiah 54:2 Enlarge the place of your tent, and let them stretch forth the
curtains of your habitations; don’t spare: lengthen your cords, and
strengthen your stakes- They would need more space for all the
children- the Gentile converts who would be made seeing that the Jews were
unresponsive (:1). This extension of her tents meant enlarging the
boundaries of the land (:3). The implication could even be that the
further they lengthened their tent cords, the more Gentile converts would
come in. "The place" of the tent, the territory where it was pitched, had
to be expanded. God's redeemed family was to be extended beyond the limits
of the eretz promised to Abraham.
Isaiah so often uses the idea of ‘stretching
out’ the Heavens with reference to His creation of His new Kingdom (Isaiah
40:22; Is. 42:5; 44:24; 45:15; 51:13; 65:17,18). Zechariah 1:6 cp. 12:1
show that to stretch out Jerusalem is parallel with stretching out the
‘heavens’. The ‘singing’ of the heavens refers to Judah’s intended joy at
the restoration (Isaiah 49:13 cp. 48:20). Israel were being told to peg
out their tent as wide and far as they could; because this would be the
extent of their Kingdom. The Kingdom would be as ‘large’ for them as they
had vision for in this life.
Isaiah 54:3 For you shall spread out on the right hand and on the left;
and your seed shall possess the nations- See on :2.
GNB "You will extend your boundaries on all sides; your people will get
back the land that the other nations now occupy". The idea is that Israel
would possess all the nations within the eretz promised to
Abraham, and yet expand those borders. The Abrahamic promise was that the
seed would possess the gate of their enemies- the nations on the edges of
and bordering on the eretz (Gen. 22:17; 24:60).
And make the desolate cities to
be inhabited-
At
the restoration the
temple still lay “waste” (Hag. 1:4,9) just as it had lain “desolate” [s.w.
Jer. 33:10,12] after the Babylonian destruction. The ‘restoration’ was in
fact not really a restoration at all, in God’s eyes. Thus Ezra sat down
desolate [AV “astonied”] at the news of Judah’s apostasy in marrying the
surrounding women; using the very same word as frequently used to describe
the ‘desolate’ Jerusalem that was to be rebuilt (Ezra 9:3 cp. Is. 49:8,19;
54:3; 61:4). He tore his priestly garment (Ezra 9:3), as if he realized
that all Ezekiel’s prophesies about those priestly garments now couldn’t
come true (s.w. Ez. 42:14; 44:17,19). Is. 58:12,13 prophesied that the
acceptable rebuilding of Zion was dependent upon Judah keeping the Sabbath
acceptably; and yet Nehemiah’s record makes clear their tragic abuse of
the Sabbath at the time of the restoration; and this therefore meant that
the rebuilding of the temple and city were not going to fulfill the
Messianic prophecies about them which existed.
Isaiah 54:4 Don’t be afraid; for you shall not be ashamed: neither be
confounded; for you shall not be disappointed-
Harmonizing with the second half of the verse, LXX has "Fear not, because
thou has been put to shame, neither be confounded, because thou was
reproached". The shame of the Babylonian captivity was strong in their
reasoning; they feared leaving Babylon lest such shame be repeated.
It
was to be the makers of idols who were "confounded" (s.w. Is. 41:11;
45:16) and only the true Israel would not be "confounded" (Is. 45:17;
54:4). The sinners in Israel had refused to be confounded or ashamed of
their sins (Jer. 3:3 s.w.) and so they would be shamed in condemnation.
Repentance involves an imagination of ourselves coming to judgment day and
being condemned, and feeling shame for that; that is how we shall not be
ashamed. And it is the servant alone who shall not be ashamed / confounded
because of His righteousness (Is. 50:7). Our identity with Him removes
that shame. If we condemn ourselves, we shall not be condemned (1 Cor.
11:31). The enemies of Israel would perish alongside the apostate within
Israel, in the same judgment.
Yahweh had promised support for them if they returned to the land; He
would preserve them on the way. Consider Is. 50:10: “Who is among you that
feareth the LORD, that obeyeth the voice [s.w. Ezra 1:1 re the
proclamation of Cyrus] of his servant [i.e. Cyrus, Is. 45:1], that walketh
in darkness, and hath no light? let him trust in the name of the LORD, and
stay upon his God”. Yet Ezra was ashamed to ask the king for soldiers to
guard them on the journey only because he had earlier told the king that
Yahweh would be with them (Ezra 8:22), as if he really did want the
support but was ashamed to ask for it. He disallowed Isaiah’s prophesy
that the restored Israel would never be ashamed [s.w. Ezra 8:22; 9:6] nor
confounded (Is. 45:17; 49:23; 54:4). Nehemiah accepted such support when
he came up from Babylon (Neh. 2:9).
For you shall forget the
shame of your youth; and the reproach of your widowhood you shall remember
no more- Their widowhood implied their husband Yahweh had as it were
died; see on :1.
Isaiah 54:5 For your Maker is your husband; Yahweh of Armies is His name:
and the Holy One of Israel is your Redeemer; the God of the whole earth
shall He be called- As explained on :2,3, the entire eretz
promised to Abraham would convert to Yahweh. LXX "He that delivered thee,
He is the God of Israel, and shall be called so by the whole earth".
And this could have potentially happened had the exiles returned in faith
and repentance.
"The Holy One of Israel; the God of the whole earth"- a phrase used in
Zechariah regarding the Angel co-ordinating the restoration.
Israel is so often set up as the bride of God (Is. 54:5; 61:10; 62:4,5;
Jer. 2:2; 3:14; Hos. 2:19,20). This is why any infidelity of theirs to God
is spoken of as adultery (Mal. 2:11; Lev. 17:7; 20:5,6; Dt. 31:16; Jud.
2:17; 8:27,33; Hos. 9:1). The very language of Israel 'selling themselves
to do iniquity' uses the image of prostitution. This is how God feels our
even temporary and fleeting acts and thoughts of unfaithfulness. This is
why God is jealous for Israel (Ex. 20:15; 34:14; Dt. 4:24; 5:9; 6:15)-
because His undivided love for them is so exclusive. He expects them to be
totally
His.
Isaiah 54:6 For Yahweh has called you as a wife forsaken and grieved in
spirit, even a wife of youth, when she is cast off, says your God-
see on Zech. 11:10,11.
God speaks as if He died, and therefore Israel was left as a widow (Is.
54:4,6); see on :1. "Cast off" is the term found later in the prophets:
“My
God will cast them away” (Hos. 9:17; Is. 54:6); the same Hebrew word
occurs when God says He would “reject” Israel (Hos. 4:6). But even when Israel
were to be in the land of their enemies as punishment for their sins, “I
will not cast them away” [s.w.] (Lev. 26:44). God will not cast away
Israel (Is. 41:9). Only if Heaven can be measured will God cast away
Israel (Jer. 31:37). God has not cast away His people (Rom. 11:2). We see
here the deep tension within God's mind as He considers His status and
position toward His unfaithful people. He
here
compares Himself to a young man hopelessly in love with a woman (Israel)
who was really no good, a man who took the blame when it was undoubtedly
her fault (Is. 54:6,7), grieving that she wouldn't return to Him (Am. 4:8
etc.). "I am broken with their whorish heart... I am crushed" (Ez. 6:9;
Jer. 8:21 NIV). God likens Himself to a broken man because of Israel's
fickleness. He went through the pain of the man who knows He has been
forgotten by the woman he still desperately remembers (Hos. 2:13).
Isaiah 54:7 For a small moment have I forsaken you; but with great mercies
will I gather you-
But even in this small moment [intended to be 70 years], He was watering them and caring for
them. He is involved "every moment" in the life of His people;
Job, presented as the suffering exiles, came to realize this (Is. 27:3 cp.
Job 7:18 s.w.).
The
sufferings of Christ on the cross have connections with the punishments
for Israel's sins (e.g. being offered gall to drink = Jer. 8:14; Lam.
3:5). Israel were temporarily forsaken by God because of their sins (Is.
49:14; 54:7), and therefore so was the Lord. He too was chastened with the
rod of men "and with the stripes of the children of men", i.e. Israel (Is.
53:5; 1 Pet. 2:24; Mic. 5:1), in His death on the cross.
The deathless love of Hosea for Gomer, the very intensity and height of
it, in itself highlights the tragedy of God. That His love, yes, the
passion and longing of God Himself, was rejected by His people. There are
some reasons to think that the book of Hosea was rewritten (under
inspiration) during the captivity. Isaiah had explained here that
although God and Israel had departed from each other, they would come
together again by Israel being regathered- i.e. by their return from
Babylon to the land. And perhaps Hosea was rewritten at the same time, as
an appeal for the Jews to ‘return’ to their God, i.e. to return to Judah.
And yet, so tragically, whilst they all avowed their allegiance to Yahweh,
generously supported the few who did return… the majority of the Jews
didn’t return to their God. They chose the soft life in Babylon, where
they remained. It’s why the close of the book of Esther is so sad- the
Jews are there in prosperity and popularity in Babylon, no longer weeping
by the rivers of Babylon.
Isaiah 54:8 In overflowing wrath I hid My face from you for a moment; but
with everlasting loving kindness will I have mercy on you-
We
read of the anger of God "for a moment" (Ps. 30:5; Is. 54:7,8), and of His
wrath coming and going, leaving Him "calm" and no longer angry (Ez.
16:42). When we sin, we provoke God to anger- i.e. at a point in time, God
sees our sin, and becomes angry. This is attested many times in Scripture.
But it's meaningless if God is somehow outside of our time and emotions.
The
very use of the terms 'remembering' and 'forgetting' suggest God is so
fully willing to enter into our kind of time; for a Being cannot forget
and remember simultaneously, an element of time is involved. Likewise at
times we read of God being slow to anger (Ex. 34:6), at others, of Him not
restraining His anger, or restraining it (Ps. 78:38; Is. 48:9; Lam. 2:8;
Ez. 20:22), and holding His peace (Is. 57:11; Ps. 50:21), and being
provoked to anger by the bad behaviour of His covenant people (Dt. 32:21;
Ps. 78:58; Is. 65:3; Jer. 8:19). God clearly has emotions of a kind which
are not unrelated to the emotions we experience, as beings made in His
image. But those emotions involve a time factor in order to be emotions.
The
prophets spoke of the amazing grace and eternal love of God for Israel,
how His wrath endured but for a moment (Is. 54:8; 57:16); and yet
Israel asked: “Will He be angry for ever?” (Jer. 3:5). It was more than
frustrating for the prophets; they shared God’s feelings of having poured
out so great a love, to see it ignored and disregarded, no time to look at
it, too busy sowing my seeds, weeding my garden, having coffee…
Says Yahweh
your Redeemer-
As
Hosea ‘redeemed’ Gomer in His attempt to force through His fantasy for her
(Hos. 3:1), so Yahweh is repeatedly described in Isaiah as Israel’s
go’el , redeemer (Is. 41:14; Is. 43:14; Is. 44:6,24; Is. 47:4; Is.
48:17; Is. 49:7,26; Is. 54:5,8). The redeemer could redeem a close
relative from slavery or repurchase property lost during hard times (Lev.
25:25,26, 47-55; Ruth 2:20; Ruth 3:9,12). The redeemer was also the
avenger of blood (Num. 35:9-28; Josh. 20:3,9). All these ideas were
relevant to Yahweh’s relationship to Judah in captivity. But the promised
freedom didn’t come- even under Nehemiah, Judah was still a province
within the Persian empire. And those who returned complained: “We are
slaves this day in the land you gave…” (Neh. 9:36). The wonderful
prophecies of freedom and redemption from slavery weren’t realized in
practice, because of the selfishness of the more wealthy Jews. And how
often is it that the freedom potentially enabled for those redeemed in
Christ is in practice denied them by their autocratic and abusive brethren
Isaiah 54:9 For this is like the waters of Noah to Me; for as I have sworn
that the waters of Noah shall no more go over the earth, so have I sworn
that I will not be angry with you, nor rebuke you-
LXX offers "From the time of the water of Noe this is my purpose". The
idea is that out of judgment comes a new creation, where the wrath of God
doesn't figure because it has as it were been dealt with through the
judgments. What is in view is a time when His judgments shall never again
need to be revealed upon His people. This could have happened at the
restoration but it evidently didn't, and all this is therefore reapplied
to the time of the Lord's return.
Isaiah 54:10 For the mountains may depart, and the hills be removed; but
My loving kindness shall not depart from you- The departure of the
mountains may refer to the huge geological changes at the time of the
flood, but the mountains also figuratively refer to the nations and
kingdoms which would be subsumed beneath the mountain of Yahweh's Kingdom-
which could have come when the little stone of the exiles were cut out of
the mountain of Babylon / Persia and returned to the land. But another,
longer term fulfilment of the image prophecy of Dan. 2 had to come into
play. As discussed there, the metals of the image initially represented
"kings", and the application to "kingdoms" was brought about by the
refusal of the exiles to repent and act as the little stone destroying the
image of Babylon.
Neither shall My covenant of
peace be removed, says Yahweh who has mercy on you- Every
Israelite was intended to be a priest; they were to be "a Kingdom of
priests". The "covenant of my peace" was with both Israel (Is. 54:10) and
the priesthood (Mal. 2:5). The same is true of spiritual Israel; "a
spiritual house, an holy priesthood" (1 Pet. 2:5). But the covenant in
view was likely the new covenant of peace with God which the exiles could
have accepted (Ez. 20; Jer. 31).
Isaiah 54:11 You afflicted- This is the word usually translated
"poor" in the material sense. It was the poor who were to enthuse about
the reestablishment of Zion (Is. 14:32; 41:17; 66:2 s.w.). The book of
Esther makes clear that there were many wealthy Jews in Babylon / Persia.
It was the simple pull of materialism which kept many of them from
responding to the Gospel of quitting all that for the sake of the restored
Kingdom of God. And it is the same today where "to the poor the Gospel is
preached" with most response.
Tossed with storms- The usual word for "whirlwind", the
symbol of God's judgment which had scattered them in exile. It is also the
term used for Jonah's experience in the storm (Jonah 1:11,13); and he is
to be read as representative of a disbelieving Israel.
And not comforted- The "comfort" of Is. 40 had been offered
to them, but they had refused. But here God as it were feels sorry for
them even in their "not comforted" position, which was due to their
refusal of His comfort. Such is His grace and His earnest desire to
as it were force through, as far as legitimate, His saving purpose with
His people.
Behold,
I will set your stones in beautiful colours, and lay your foundations with
sapphires-
The
“stones” were laid (Nehemiah 4:2 s.w.), but not with colours, as could
have been (Is. 54:11-14). And neither were the foundation stones
gemstones, as could have been. This prophecy was therefore reapplied in
Revelation to the things of the Kingdom to be established at the Lord’s
return.
Isaiah 54:12 I will make your pinnacles of rubies, and your gates of
sparkling jewels, and all your walls of precious stones-
LXX "and thy gates crystal"; GNB "and the wall around you with
jewels"; see on :11. This is all alluded to in the description of the new
Jerusalem in Rev. 21,22. It could've come true at the time of the exiles,
had they repented; but is deferred to the second coming of the Lord Jesus.
Isaiah 54:13 All your children shall be taught of Yahweh; and great shall
be the peace of your children-
Their children were not taught of Yahweh, because the priests were lazy to
do so (Mal. 2). And so Yahweh Himself (who is speaking here) will teach
them; hence GNB "I myself will teach your people". Teaching was envisaged
as going forth from the restored Zion (Is. 2:2-4). But many of the exiles
preferred to remain in exile because they likely excused themselves with
the argument that remaining would be better for their children.
Isaiah 54:14 In righteousness you shall be established: you shall be far
from oppression, for you shall not be afraid; and from terror, for it
shall not come near you- This could be an appeal for the exiles to
act rightly and justly so that the Kingdom could come about. Hence LXX
"abstain from injustice, and thou shalt not fear; and trembling shall not
come nigh thee".
Isaiah 54:15 Behold, they may gather together, but not by Me: whoever
shall gather together against you shall fall because of you- The idea
may be that whoever now attacks Judah, would not be doing so under God's
direction as had previously been the case. And they would therefore face
His wrath and destruction (:17). LXX "Behold, strangers shall come to thee
by me, and shall sojourn with thee, and shall run to thee for refuge".
Isaiah 54:16 Behold, I have created the smith who blows the fire of coals,
and brings forth a weapon for his work; and I have created the waster to
destroy- This leads on to the statement in :17 that the forming of
any weapon against Israel is doomed. The creators were themselves created,
by God- including those who had been created to destroy God's people in
judgment. Both evil and good were from God (Is. 45:5-7). These who were
created by God to destroy contrast with the category noted in :15, who
were not sent by God in this mission.
Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is formed against you will prevail- The
"weapon" is that of :16. The exiles imagined all manner of opposition if
they were to accept the prophetic call to quit Babylon / Persia and return
to Judah. But God's promise was that they would leave in peace, be led by
His visible presence and have the natural creation bursting into applause
on the way (see on Is. 55:12). But they doubted that, focusing upon all
the human devices ["weapons"] which they imagined might stand in the way.
So many today likewise resist the call of the Gospel of the restored
Kingdom of God for the same reasons. The word for "prevail" is used four
times in the record of Rebekah's journey from the east (where the exiles
were) to the land of promise; it was indeed made prosperous (Gen.
24:21,40,42,56). And their journey to the land of the Kingdom likewise
would have been made prosperous, and no opposition to it could have
prospered with God on their side. The prophetic word of the restoration
was to prosper and achieve their return and revival (Is. 55:11).
And you
will condemn every tongue that rises against you in judgement- See on
Is. 51:1,6,7. As explained on Is. 50:8, we need not fear
insults nor false accusation from men because we shall ultimately be
justified, and even now have righteousness imputed to us. And the exiles
were invited to believe that, as they imagined all the verbal opposition
they might encounter by returning to Judah.
This is the
heritage of the servants of Yahweh, and their righteousness which is of
Me, says Yahweh- This again refers to what Paul would term imputed
righteousness, counting right those who believe in God's grace. LXX "ye
shall be righteous before me".