Deeper Commentary
2Ch 13:1 In the eighteenth year of king Jeroboam began Abijah to
reign over Judah-
Called Abijam in 1 Kings 15:1, which means "father of the sea", but 'father of' can mean 'worshipper
of', as 'Abijah' means 'father / worshipper of Yah'. The sea god was
worshipped, and so we conclude this was reflective of pagan devotions. He is
called Abijah in 2 Chronicles, 'worshipper of Yah'. Having both a pagan and
Yahwistic name was typical of the times, and Maacah / Michaiah his mother
had a similar two names (see on :2). 2 Chron. 11:20-22 shows that Rehoboam
had 28 sons. Abijam wasn't the firstborn, but rather the firstborn son of
the favoured wife. Abijam had 38 children (2 Chron. 13:21), so he must have
been a reasonable age when he came to the throne.
2Ch 13:2 He reigned three years in Jerusalem. His mother’s name was Micaiah
the daughter of Uriel of Gibeah. There was war between Abijah and Jeroboam-
LXX gives Maacah for Micaiah, "the daughter of Absalom" (2 Chron.
11:20). "Daughter" may be grand daughter, as she was the daughter of Uriel.
2 Sam. 18:18 says that Absalom had no son, so presumably he had this
daughter who married Uriel and became mother to Maacah. Michaiah, "Who is
like Jehovah?", was known by her more pagan name Maachah, "oppression". The
records of the kings so often mention their mothers, in reflection of the
huge spiritual influence of a mother upon her children. The three years is a
figure inclusive of parts of years, as he became king in the 18th year of
Jeroboam's reign in Israel and died in his 20th year. "Three days / years"
is often not a literal figure, and this must be recalled when considering
the chronology of the Lord's three days in the tomb
2Ch 13:3 Abijah joined battle with an army of valiant men of war,
even four hundred thousand chosen men. Jeroboam set the battle in array
against him with eight hundred thousand chosen men, who were mighty men of
valour-
We note that "hundred" and "thousand" are often used to denote military
divisions, rather than literally 100 or 1000. This would indicate disobedience to the command to Rehoboam not to
fight the ten tribes (1 Kings 12:24). The terrible sin and tragedy of
fighting ones own brethren is noted twice (also in 1 Kings 14:30).
2Ch 13:4 Abijah stood up on Mount Zemaraim, which is in the hill country
of Ephraim, and said, Hear me, Jeroboam and all Israel-
Zemaraim was in the territory assigned to Benjamin (Josh. 18:22), but
is located "in the hill country of Ephraim" in 2 Chron. 13:4. Clearly the
inheritances were flexible in practice. Zemaraim was on the border of
Benjamin and Ephraim, so this was an appropriate place for Israel and
Judah to meet in battle.
2Ch 13:5 Ought you not to know that Yahweh, the God of Israel, gave the
kingdom over Israel to David forever, even to him and to his sons by a
covenant of salt?-
This was true only to an extent. The Davidic covenant was very clearly
conditional upon obedience and faithfulness, and the wording clearly
envisaged that the seed of David might not be that. And therefore Jeroboam
himself had been offered the possibility of being the Messianic king, even
though he was not of the line of David. Salt made a sacrifice meaningful
(Lev. 2:13), and therefore a "covenant of salt" meant a sure covenant
confirmed by sacrifice (Num. 18:19). David and Solomon had both dedicated
the plans for the temple with abundant sacrifices, claiming that the
covenant with David was fulfilled in Solomon and confirmed through the
building of the temple. But that was on their initiative and suggestion,
and in reality Solomon had broken that covenant.
2Ch 13:6 Yet Jeroboam the son of Nebat, the servant of Solomon the son of
David, rose up, and rebelled against his lord-
This again was true but only to an extent. The kingdom was rent away
from the house of David for their apostacy, and Jeroboam had potentially
been enabled to be a new Messianic king. He failed in that, but to blame
the division solely upon Jeroboam merely being a rebellious servant was
Abijah's biased narrative.
2Ch 13:7 There were gathered to him vain men, base fellows, who strengthened
themselves against Rehoboam the son of Solomon, when Rehoboam was young and
tenderhearted, and could not withstand them-
Rehoboam was 41 when he became king, so again Abijah is spinning
narrative according to his own bias.
2Ch 13:8 Now you think to withstand the kingdom of Yahweh in the hand of
the sons of David. You are a great multitude, and there are with you the
golden calves which Jeroboam made you for gods-
Abijah recognizes they are double his strength, but he seeks to touch
their conscience about the golden calves, as if they are as it were
pitting themselves against Yahweh. Even though his own wife was an
idolater and he likely was too. He is leading up to the argument that they
are fighting against God (:12). See on :21. He overlooks how God Himself
withstood the line of David and had torn away the ten tribes and given
them to Jeroboam, with the potential to make a Messianic kingdom out of
them.
2Ch 13:9 Haven’t you driven out the priests of Yahweh, the sons of Aaron,
and the Levites, and made priests for yourselves after the ways of the
peoples of other lands? So that whoever comes to consecrate himself with a
young bull and seven rams, the same may be a priest of those who are not
gods-
Yahweh's priests were consecrated with a young bull and two rams (Ex.
29:1). Again we see how Jeroboam crafted a false religious system on the
basis of the true one, and that is typical of all our apostacy. And whilst
perhaps they did drive out Yahweh's Levitical priests, it's likely many
left the apostacy of their own accord. Although they would've arrived in a
Judah also given over to idolatry, with the queen Maacah an idolater;
hence God's wrath with Judah through Shishak's invasion.
2Ch 13:10 But as for us, Yahweh is our God, and we have not forsaken Him.
We have priests ministering to Yahweh, the sons of Aaron, and the Levites
in their work-
This was untrue, they had forsaken Yahweh and been seriously punished
for it by Shishak, and the queen was an idolater. Abijah, like many in the
orthodox churches, reasoned that because he had a priesthood obeying
Mosaic commands, therefore and thereby they had not forsaken Yahweh. He
thought that religious structure alone defined his faith in and loyalty to
Yahweh.
2Ch 13:11 and they burn to Yahweh every morning and every evening burnt
offerings and sweet incense. They also set the showbread in order on the
pure table; and the lampstand of gold with its lamps, to burn every
evening. We keep the instruction of Yahweh our God; but you have forsaken
Him-
Shishak's invasion had perhaps taken away the plural "gold tables"
for the showbread, and forced them to return to the Godly, Mosaic pattern
of just one table for the showbread.
The table of show bread was to be made of acacia wood (Ex. 25:23), but David planned to make it of pure gold, and even worked out the weight of gold required for it (1 Chron. 28:16). And Solomon indeed made it of gold (1 Kings 7:48), leading to it being known as "the pure table" (2 Chron. 13:11). Religion had overtaken spirituality, form had eclipsed content. Likewise the "tables of silver" David ordered to be made (1 Chron. 28:16) do not feature in the tabernacle. He was missing the point- that God wanted His holiest symbols made of common, weak things like acacia wood. For His strength and glory is made perfect in weakness. David claims these plans were from God (1 Chron. 28:19), although as discussed on 1 Chron. 28:12, they were in fact from his own mind. The way these things were taken into captivity, with no record of this golden table ever being returned, surely reflects God's judgment upon this kind of religious show. He prefers a humble house church in an inner city room, rather than a gold plated cathedral. The way some exclusive churches speak of 'maintaining a pure table' suggests they have made the same essential mistake as David did.
2Ch 13:12 Behold, God is with us at our head, and His priests with the
trumpets of alarm to sound an alarm against you. Children of Israel-
We read here of Abijah's apparent devotion. The comment of 1 Kings 15:3
is that his heart wasn't perfect with Yahweh as David's was. David clearly
sinned and seems to have suffered a decline in his ethics and spirituality
as he got older. But he was judged on the overall dominant desire of his
heart, to the point that having a heart perfect with Yahweh seems to
effectively mean 'He was wholeheartedly devoted to Yahweh and never
worshipped other gods'. Whereas Abijah, despite peaks of spirituality and
an appearance of loyalty to Him, did
not have that total devotion to Yahweh as the dominant position of his
heart throughout his life. Whatever peaks of obedience and devotion we may
attain at points in our lives, it is the overall core position of our
heart which is judged. Men like David may sin terribly at some points,
those like Abijah may achieve wonderful levels of devotion at some points.
But those high or low points play no major part in the final, unknowable
equilibrium of Divine judgment. We need to remember this, as we encounter
our brethren and ponder what to make of them, in their pits of sin and
heights of devotion. Those points on their graph ought not to unduly
weight our overall position on them.
The reference to trumpets alludes to Num. 10:9, and Abijah thought that by merely blowing trumpets he would have Yahweh's help. This is why he was driven to a desperate situation in the battle with Jeroboam, so that he really called to Yahweh with all his heart, and not through mere ritualism.
Don’t
fight against Yahweh, the God of your fathers; for you shall not prosper-
Acts 5:39; 23:9 appear to allude to this. But as pointed out on :8,
Abijah himself was associated with idolatry, and as with the context of
the Acts allusions, this is a rather twisted argument. 'If you fight me
you're fighting God' has been an oft deployed argument that often lacks
full integrity. See on :21.
2Ch 13:13 But Jeroboam caused an ambush to come about behind them: so they
were before Judah, and the ambush was behind them-
As discussed on :14, this was meant by God to put Judah into a
hopeless situation. I have shown above that Judah were not much better
than Israel and their claims to be faithful to Yahweh were hypocritical.
But they were put into a situation which forced them to realize that, and
to truly repent and cry to Yahweh from their hearts.
2Ch 13:14 When Judah looked back, behold, the battle was before and behind
them; and they cried to Yahweh, and the priests sounded with the trumpets-
The reference to trumpets alludes to Num. 10:9, and Abijah thought
that by merely blowing trumpets he would have Yahweh's help. This is why
he was driven to a desperate situation in the battle with Jeroboam, so
that he really called to Yahweh with all his heart, and not through mere
ritualism. The "shout" of :15 was their cry from the heart to God, and He
responded to that. We all tend to repeat the same words in prayer, until
prayer becomes little more than ritualism, the blowing of trumpets which
Abijah had practiced. But then situations are brought into our lives
when we "shout" to God from the heart, praying as we ought to- and then He
responds.
2Ch 13:15 Then the men of Judah gave a shout; and as the men of Judah
shouted, it happened, that God struck Jeroboam and all Israel before
Abijah and Judah-
As explained on :14, this "shout" was a cry from the heart to Yahweh,
well beyond the mere ritualism of blowing trumpets. Judah were not much
better than Israel, as demonstrated above. But they cried from the heart
to Yahweh, whereas Israel didn't. And so God gave them victory, and used
them to punish Jeroboam for his impenitent apostacy.
2Ch 13:16 The children of Israel fled before Judah; and God delivered them
into their hand-
Judah weren't much better than Israel. But God so respects faith and
repentance, even if in extremity, such as on a deathbed- that He responds.
.
2Ch 13:17 Abijah and his people killed them with a great slaughter; so
there fell down slain of Israel five hundred thousand chosen men-
"Thousand" is not to be read literally; the term often refers to a
military division of some sort. And they didn't fall in the same day, as
the fighting continued for some time (:19).
2Ch 13:18 Thus the children of Israel were overcome at that time, and the
children of Judah prevailed, because they relied on Yahweh, the God of
their fathers-
They relied on Him at one point, and were rewarded for it. But not
generally. This reflects God's extreme sensitivity to faith in Him, even
if He knows the surrounding context of a man's life is not of faith in
Him. "Relied" is the word used in 2 Chron. 14:11; 16:8 in a similar
context.
2Ch 13:19 Abijah pursued after Jeroboam, and took cities from him: Bethel
with its suburbs, Jeshanah with its suburbs and Ephron with its suburbs-
These victories were short-lived, because Bethel soon returned to the
northern kingdom, and the golden calf there was not destroyed by Judah as
it should have been (2 Kings 10:29).
2Ch 13:20 Jeroboam didn’t recover strength again in the days of Abijah.
Yahweh struck him, and he died-
This implies special judgment from God (1 Sam. 25:38; Acts 12:13).
2Ch 13:21 But Abijah grew mighty, and took to himself fourteen wives, and
became the father of twenty-two sons, and sixteen daughters-
"Grew mighty" is the same word Abijah has twice used in :7,8,
claiming in :8 that Jeroboam was withstanding or growing mighty against
Yahweh. Perhaps the hint is that Abijah was really no better (see on
:8,12), because he too withstood Yahweh in marrying so many wives, at
least one of whom [the favourite] was an unashamed idolater.
2Ch 13:22 The rest of the acts of Abijah, and his ways and his sayings,
are written in the commentary of the prophet Iddo-
Neither the sayings of Abijah nor the book of Iddo have been preserved.
There are many writings referenced within scripture which are not now
available. The book of the prophet Iddo may well have been inspired by
God, but was only useful for its time. The scriptures we have are
therefore the result of careful Divine selection, and all of them are
somehow relevant to us, even the Chronicles genealogies, in a way these
other writings aren't.